Thursday, July 9, 2015

GREEK ECONOMY: IS IT ON THE VERGE OF COLLAPSE OR HAS ALREADY DECAYED???

WHY WORLD COUNTED UPON GREECE???

Greece is the birthplace of Democracy, Western philosophy, the Olympic Games, Western Literature, Historiography, Political Science, Major Scientific and Mathematical Principles, and Western Drama, including both tragedy and comedy. The cultural and technological achievements of Greece have greatly influenced the world, having been imparted to the East through Alexander the Great's conquests, and to the West via incorporation into the Roman Empire and the succeeding Byzantine Empire. Greece's rich legacy is also reflected by its 17 UNESCO World Heritage Sites, among the most in Europe and the world.


A founding member of the United Nations, Greece was the tenth member to join the European Communities (precursor to the European Union) and has been part of the Eurozone since 2001. It is also a member of numerous other international institutions, including the Council of Europe, NATO, OECD, OSCE and the WTO. Greece, which is one of the world's largest shipping powers, has the largest economy in the Balkans, where it is an important regional investor.

Greece is the 15th largest economy in the 27-member European Union. In terms of per capita income, Greece is ranked 38th or 40th in the world at $21,910 and $25,705 for nominal GDP and PPP respectively. 



GREECE ENTRY IN EUROZONE…



In January 2001 Greece adopted the Euro as its currency, replacing the Greek drachma at an exchange rate of 340.75 drachma to the Euro. Greece is also a member of the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.

Greece was accepted into the Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union by the European Council on 19 June 2000, based on a number of criteria (inflation rate, budget deficit, public debt, long-term interest rates, exchange rate) using 1999 as the reference year. 

REVELATION OF UNDER REPORTED BUDGET DEFICIT 

After an audit commissioned by the incoming New Democracy government in 2004, Eurostat revealed that the statistics for the budget deficit had been under-reported.

Most of the differences in the revised budget deficit numbers were due to a temporary change of accounting practices by the new government, i.e., recording expenses when military material was ordered rather than received. However, it was the retroactive application of ESA95 methodology (applied since 2000) by Eurostat, that finally raised the reference year (1999) budget deficit to 3.38% of GDP, thus exceeding the 3% limit. This led to claims that Greece (similar claims have been made about other European countries like Italy) had not actually met all five accession criteria, and the common perception that Greece entered the Eurozone through "falsified" deficit numbers.


In the 2005 OECD report for Greece, it was clearly stated that "the impact of new accounting rules on the fiscal figures for the years 1997 to 1999 ranged from 0.7 to 1 percentage point of GDP; this retroactive change of methodology was responsible for the revised deficit exceeding 3% in 1999, the year of [Greece's] EMU membership qualification". The above led the Greek minister of finance to clarify that the 1999 budget deficit was below the prescribed 3% limit when calculated with the ESA79 methodology in force at the time of Greece's application, and thus the criteria had been met.
The original accounting practice for military expenses was later restored in line with Eurostat recommendations, theoretically lowering even the ESA95-calculated 1999 Greek budget deficit to below 3% (an official Eurostat calculation is still pending for 1999).

A frequent error is the confusion of the discussion regarding Greece's Eurozone entry with the controversy regarding usage of derivatives' deals with US banks by Greece and other Eurozone countries to artificially reduce their reported budget deficits. A currency swap arranged with Goldman Sachs allowed Greece to "hide" $1 billion of debt; however, this affected deficit values after 2001 (when Greece had already been admitted into the Eurozone) and is not related to Greece's Eurozone entry.

Forensic accountants found that data submitted by Greece to Eurostat had a statistical distribution indicative of manipulation.

BEGINNING OF ECONOMIC CRISIS…

By the end of 2009, as a result of a combination of international and local factors the Greek economy faced its most-severe crisis since the restoration of democracy in 1974 as the Greek government revised its deficit from an estimated 6% to 12.7% of gross domestic product (GDP).

In early 2010, through the assistance of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and numerous other banks, financial products were developed which enabled the governments of Greece, Italy and many other European countries to hide their borrowing. Dozens of similar agreements were concluded across Europe whereby banks supplied cash in advance in exchange for future payments by the governments involved; in turn, the liabilities of the involved countries were "kept off the books".

These conditions had enabled Greek as well as many other European governments to spend beyond their means, while meeting the deficit targets of the European Union.

In May 2010, the Greek government deficit was again revised and estimated to be 13.6% which was the second highest in the world relative to GDP with Iceland in first place at 15.7% and the United Kingdom third with 12.6%.

As a consequence, there was a crisis in international confidence in Greece's ability to repay its sovereign debt. To avert such a default, in May 2010 the other Eurozone countries, and the IMF, agreed to a rescue package which involved giving Greece an immediate €45 billion in loans, with more funds to follow, totalling €110 billion. To secure the funding, Greece was required to adopt harsh austerity measures to bring its deficit under control.

On 15 November 2010, the EU's statistics body Eurostat revised the public finance and debt figure for Greece and put its 2009 government deficit at 15.4% of GDP and public debt at 126.8% of GDP making it the biggest deficit (as a percentage of GDP) among the EU member nations.


In 2011, it became apparent that the bail-out would be insufficient and a second bail-out amounting to €130 billion ($173 billion) was agreed in 2012, subject to strict conditions, including financial reforms and further austerity measures. The so-called troika eventually lend the total more than 240 billion euros, or about $264 billion at today's exchange rates. The bailouts came with conditions. Lenders imposed harsh austerity terms, requiring deep budget cuts and steep tax increases. They also required Greece to overhaul its economy by streamlining the government, ending tax evasion and making Greece an easier place to do business.

Greece's accession to the euro helped to lower the country's borrowing costs. European banks lent the country billions of euros, which it used to pay for things such as the 2004 Olympic Games and higher salaries for the country's public sector workforce. The boom quickly turned to bust following the 2008 financial crisis.

As part of the deal, there was to be a 53% reduction in the Greek debt burden to private creditors and any profits made by Eurozone central banks on their holdings of Greek debt are to be repatriated back to Greece.

Greece became the epicenter of Europe's debt crisis after Wall Street imploded in 2008. With global financial markets still reeling, Greece announced in October 2009 that it had been understating its deficit figures for years, raising alarms about the soundness of Greek finances.

Greece's debt-to-GDP ratio surged from 109 per cent in 2008 to 146 per cent in 2010. Following this, the country was downgraded to junk bond status, which cut off its access to bond markets. Investors panicked and turned their attention to other indebted economies, notably Italy, Spain and France. By the spring of 2010, it was veering toward bankruptcy, which threatened to set off a new financial crisis.

Greece’s unemployment rate has climbed steadily since the 2008 Recession and now stands at approximately 25%.
OPPOSITION OF AUSTERITY MEASURES

The austerity measures were widely unpopular in Greece. In December 2014, Greek parliament called for a premature election. The central issue during the election was the austerity measures imposed by the troika.

The new government that came to power refused to accept the terms of the agreement. The political uncertainty led to a suspension of the remaining tranche of aid, unless Greece accepted the original terms of the bailout or mutually reached an agreement with its public creditors.


The money was supposed to buy Greece time to stabilize its finances and quell market fears that the euro union itself could break up. While it has helped, Greece's economic problems haven't gone away. The economy has shrunk by a quarter in five years, and unemployment is above 25 percent.

The bailout money mainly goes toward paying off Greece's international loans, rather than making its way into the economy. And the government still has a staggering debt load that it cannot begin to pay down unless a recovery takes hold.

Many economists, and many Greeks, blame the austerity measures for much of the country's continuing problems. The leftist Syriza party rode to power this year promising to renegotiate the bailout; Tsipras said that austerity had created a "humanitarian crisis" in Greece.

The current Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, is a member of the Syriza party, which has pushed for anti-austerity measures. He has rejected harsh austerity measures, referring to them as “unbearable.”
But the country's exasperated creditors, especially Germany, blame Athens for failing to conduct the economic overhauls required under its bailout agreement. They don't want to change the rules for Greece.As the debate rages, the only thing everyone agrees on is that Greece is yet again running out of money — and fast.

HEALTH OF GREEK BANKS…


Greek banks are solvent on paper, but lending is practically at a standstill and they are not able to play the role they should in financing the economy.

The European Central Bank capped its emergency credit line for Greek banks at 89 billion. Most if not all of that money has already been used to cover withdrawals by customers, and there is virtually no money available for new loans.

If a Greek bank goes bust, it could create havoc in the financial markets, because Greece has not yet put in place European rules for the orderly shutdown of failed banks.

The country’s banking sector, which has suffered severe deposit flight, is being kept alive by liquidity via the Bank of Greece.

But the European Central Bank ultimately decides whether that liquidity remains in place. ECB rules require that this emergency liquidity only be provided to banks that are solvent—that is a stretch given that the banks are closed, Greece’s bailout program has expired, and the country is in arrears with the IMF. A decision by the ECB to demand more collateral or to revoke liquidity would be devastating, leaving Greek banks unable to reopen until they are recapitalized. That could leave Greece no choice but to leave the euro.

Greece’s prime minister imposed cash withdrawal restriction to 60 euros a day and closed banks for a week. However tourists can still withdraw money if they can find an ATM that has any cash left. The Greek stock exchanges also remain closed for a week.
One of the big four banks in Greece is almost out of cash.
MOUNTING DEBT BURDEN…

The country has been in a long standoff with its European creditors on the terms of a multibillion-dollar bailout. If the country goes bankrupt or decides to leave the 19-nation eurozone, the situation could create instability in the region and reverberate around the globe.

Greece owes the European Central Bank a 3.5 billion euro payment.

The European Financial Stability Facility has lent Greece €144.6 billion ($160 billion) in recent years and the terms of those loans allow the fund to seek immediate repayment if a borrower defaults on the IMF.

Greece owes €330bn (£234bn) to its international creditors. Most of it (60pc) is owed directly to other eurozone nations, and Germany is its biggest creditor.

The rest is owed to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the ECB, and a combination of Greek and foreign banks. Under current projections, Greece will be paying back its debts until 2057.


Greece, the weak link in the eurozone, has defaulted on its debt. The International Monetary Fund did not use the term default after Greece missed its payment deadline. The fund instead placed the country in so-called arrears.

Credit-rating agencies will not consider Greece to be in default based on missing the IMF payment, for the technical reason that the IMF is not considered a commercial borrower. But the ratings agency Standard & Poor's did say that it would designate Greece as being in default if the country cannot make payments to private creditors, like 2 billion in Greek Treasury bills that are due on July 10, 2015.

Regardless of the country's technical status, missing the payment will most likely prove to be a warning that Greece will probably be unable to meet its other obligations in coming weeks to its bond holders and to the European Central Bank. That might make the central bank less willing to continue emergency loans that have been propping up the Greek banking system for the past several weeks.

If Greece defaults on its debt, it could also be locked out of the international credit market and be forced to savagely cut government expenditure. This would have an adverse impact on growth and could increase unemployment.

While a default would mean that creditors, especially European banks, would have to take a hit, care has been taken over the past few years to insulate other European countries and the European banking system from the risks of an eventual Greek default.

The impending default on the IMF loans leaves Greece sliding towards an exit from the euro, with unforeseeable consequences for Europe's common currency project. It also carries broad implications for the global financial system.

WORSENING ECONOMIC SITUATIONS…


Since Greece's debt crisis began in 2010, most international banks and foreign investors have sold their Greek bonds and other holdings, so they are no longer vulnerable to what happens in Greece. (Some private investors, who subsequently plowed back into Greek bonds, betting on a comeback, regret that decision.)

Greece closed its banks and imposed capital controls to check the growing strains on its crippled financial system, bringing the prospect of being forced out of the euro into plain sight.

After bailout talks between the left wing government and foreign lenders broke down, the European Central Bank froze vital funding support to Greece's banks, leaving Athens with little choice but to shut down the system to keep the banks from collapsing.

Banks and the stock market remained closed for a week, and there was a daily 60 euro limit on cash withdrawals from cash machines for a week too. Capital controls are likely to last for many months at least. As speculation of capital controls increased over few weeks, Greeks have pulled billions of euros from their accounts. Long queues formed in supermarkets as shoppers stocked up on essentials.

The broader consequences for Greece's economy, now back in recession, are likely to be severe, with the tourism sector, which accounts for almost a fifth of economic output, about to start its vital summer season. Anxious to reassure tourists, the government said the 60 euro cash withdrawal limit would not apply to people using foreign credit or debit cards.

Travel companies had been warning tourists for weeks that they should take extra cash, but finding empty ATMs was still a shock to many.

Lines formed at petrol stations and the dwindling number of bank machines still holding cash, highlighting the scale of the disaster facing Greeks, who have endured more than six years of economic decline.

In a country where one in four of the workforce is without a job, the plight of the pensioners, whose monthly benefits can often be the only source of income for families, is an acutely sensitive issue.

Mindful of the fact that many older Greeks do not use credit or debit cards and so do not have access to cash machines, the government has ordered 1,000 banks to open across the country to pay out a maximum of 120 euros and issue cards.

WHAT SUNDAY’S (5 JULY, 2015) GREEK REFERENDUM MEANT…

Greek voters voted to the polls in a referendum that could decide whether the country exits the euro or resumes painful negotiations with its creditors.


Greece and its international creditors — fellow eurozone countries, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank — have been negotiating for months to come up with a plan to extend the country’s bailout program and unlock frozen rescue funds. The talks never made much progress.

Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras on June 26, 2015 shocked creditors, and the broader market, by effectively breaking off talks, calling a referendum on a proposal offered by creditors.

The referendum asked voters to accept or reject the terms included in a June 25 proposal by the creditors. But Tsipras’s stunning move led European leaders to revoke that offer. So, effectively, Greek citizens voted on a proposal that was no longer on the table.

Relations between the current Greek government and the creditors have deteriorated beyond repair and that European leaders may be prepared to let the country slip out of the eurozone.

Greeks voters overwhelmingly rejected austerity proposals from the country’s creditors - the ECB, EU and IMF - in a snap referendum called by the leftist Syriza government.

THIS IS WHAT THE EXACT MATTER OF GREECE WITH IMF…


Greece has missed its deadline to repay €1.6 billion to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Greece is now the first advanced country to default on an IMF loan, and the first country to fall into arrears with the lender since Zimbabwe in 2001. 

The IMF released a statement saying: 'We have informed our executive board that Greece is now in arrears and can only receive IMF financing once the arrears are cleared.'

Greece requested a last-minute extension from the IMF which the lender said would be dealt with 'in due course'. 

The International Monetary Fund warned that Greece would need an extension of its European Union loans and a potentially a large debt writeoff if it grows more slowly than expected and economic reforms are not implemented.

IMF is overseeing the bailout, said that even if Greek policies came back on track, loans made by Europe "will need to be extended significantly" and that the country would need further concessional financing.

The IMF said Greece would need an additional 36 billion euros ($39.89 billion) in European funding from total additional financing needs of 50 billion euros due to policy slippages and the latest proposals from Athens.

Even under the most optimistic current IMF projection and with concessional financing through 2018, it said Greece's debt to gross domestic product ratio was seen at 150 percent in 2020 and 140 percent in 2022.

Using the thresholds agreed in November 2012, a haircut that yields a reduction in debt of over 30 percent of GDP would be required to meet the November 2012 debt targets.

The Fund believes that given the fragile debt dynamics of Greece, one option would be to extend the grace period to 20 years and the amortization period to 40 years on existing EU loans and to provide new official sector loans to cover financing needs falling due on similar terms at least through 2018.
Under an IMF projection where real economic growth was lower, at just 1 percent, Greece's debt would remain above 100 percent of GDP for the next three decades, even with a lengthening of maturities and new loans on concessional terms.

A lower medium-term primary surplus of 2.5 percent of GDP and lower real GDP growth of 1 percent per year would require not only concessional financing with fixed interest rates through 2020 to cover gaps as well as doubling of grace and maturities on existing debt but also a significant haircut of debt, for instance, full write-off of the stock outstanding in the GLF facility (€53.1 billion) or any other similar operation.

The immediate effect is that Greece can no longer receive financing from the IMF under the existing extended arrangement and the IMF will not approve new financing to Greece until it clears its arrears. This is standard procedure when a member fails to repay the IMF.

Greece remains a member of the Fund, with voting rights and representation on its Executive Board. The IMF’s annual health check of a member country’s economy (called surveillance) will continue to be an obligation. For the time being, Greece will also be eligible for IMF technical assistance — that is, access to IMF expertise on a range of economic issues, including tax administration and financial sector policies.

Within 12 months, the Executive Board may consider a declaration of ineligibility against Greece if Greece continues to incur arrears to the IMF. If the non-payment persists for more than 12 months, the IMF Executive Board may declare that the country is “noncooperative” in efforts to clear arrears, which could trigger a suspension of technical assistance, possibly followed by a suspension of voting rights and, ultimately—if the non-cooperation is extreme and protracted—compulsory withdrawal from the IMF.

WHAT MAY HAPPEN NEXT???


Greece may be on the verge of not just leaving the eurozone but also the European Union itself.

New elections could also be held if Greece's financial situation worsens. Or Greece could test the willingness of Russia or China to help should talks with Europe falter.

Greece may also choose to exit Eurozone nowadays termed as GREXIT as the voting on referendum turned out to be a NO by the Greeks. Exiting the euro currency union and the European Union would also involve a legal minefield that no country has yet ventured to cross. There are also no provisions for departure, voluntary or forced, from the euro currency union.

A withdrawal from the European Union will mean Greece will have to reintroduce its old currency, Drachma, likely to be greatly devalued.


A devalued currency will boost exports, spurring growth, but the flip side is that the import bill will rise.

A devalued currency will also increase Greece's debt burden, which will still be denominated in the euro.

The impending default on the IMF loans leaves Greece sliding towards an exit from the euro, with unforeseeable consequences for Europe's common currency project. It also carries broad implications for the global financial system.

TRYING TO COME OUT FROM THIS TURMOIL… 


Greece formally asked for a three-year bailout from the eurozone’s rescue fund, though Germany said it wouldn’t consider the request until it sees a full list of reforms.

Pressure is growing on both sides to come to some kind of deal and avert a potentially imminent Greek exit from the euro. Europe needs to restructure Greece’s huge debt as a key part of an emergency-financing solution, a move Germany has resisted.

Greece’s letter is a first step toward fulfilling a demand by international creditors to come up with tougher measures in return for desperately needed financing that could keep the country from bankruptcy and even worse economic turmoil.

The letter reiterates a call for debt relief, but also says Greece will put in place tax-reform and pension-related measures by the beginning of next week, though it doesn’t go into detail.

The full list of overhauls and budget cuts is what will determine whether the application for a new rescue program will be approved by the rest of the eurozone. The currency union’s leaders will assess whether it makes sense to start formal negotiations on a bailout program at an emergency summit on Sunday (12 July, 2015).

Sunday, January 1, 2012

A Very Happy New Year!!!

Every Second, Every Minute, Every Hour, Every Day, Every Week, Every Month, Every Year add New Chapter to our Life.


Some Make us Strong, 
Some Lead us to the Right Path,
Some Gives us New Challenge,
Some Gives us Memories, 
Some Gives us A NEW "ME" in us.







Wish You All A Very Happy, Prosperous, Healthy, Wealthy and Peaceful New Year 2012 Ahead!!! 

May this Year 2012 proves to be a Better CHAPTER to be added in all of ours life!!!
 



Thursday, November 17, 2011

European Debt Crisis - How it All Started???


“EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS”, THE MOST COMMONLY DISCUSSED MATTER TODAY IN FINANCIAL WORLD AS WELL IN JOB MARKETS. WHAT IS IT EXACTALY? AND HOW IT STARTED? IS IT THE RESULTANT EFFECT OF A COUPLE OF YEARS PROBLEM OR A LONG STRETCHED PROBLEM?


All these queries will be cleared in this Article. Hold your breath this Crisis is not a couple of years old, in fact it was spreading its roots tight since the Year 2000, yes MORE THAN A DECADE!!!

Meaning of Some Terms before we Start what is EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS AND HOW IT ALL STARTED

Bailout: As a person is when arrested and seeks a Bail to come out from that arrest for some time. In the same way when a Company or a Country is when provided with an emergency financial help so that they keep running and working as before is called a Bailout. In India, Kingfisher Airlines is the recent example of this.

Austerity Measures / Plans: Austerity is a policy of deficit-cutting, lower spending, and a reduction in the amount of benefits and public services provided. Austerity policies are often used by governments to reduce their deficit spending while sometimes coupled with increases in taxes to pay back creditors to reduce debt.

European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF): It is a special purpose vehicle financed by members of the eurozone to fight the European sovereign debt crisis. It was agreed by the 27 member states of the European Union on 9 May 2010, aiming at preserving financial stability in Europe by providing financial assistance to eurozone states in economic difficulty.

Contagion: The likelihood that significant economic changes in one country will spread to other countries. Contagion can refer to the spread of either economic booms or economic crises throughout a geographic region. Contagion has become a more prominent phenomenon as the global economy has grown and economies within certain geographic regions have become more correlated with one another.

HOW IT ALL STARTED?


In 1958, an organisation called European Coal and Steel Community was formed. This evolved into the European Union (EU) which was established by the Maastricht Treaty in 1993. The European Union introduced the euro on January 1, 1999. On this day, 11 member countries of the EU started using euro as their currency. It benefited countries such as Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain (together now known as the PIIGS).

Before these countries started to use the euro as a currency, they had to borrow money at interest rates much higher than the rates at which a country like Germany borrowed. When these countries started to use the euro they could borrow money at interest rates close to that of Germany, which was economically the best managed country in the EU.

OVERBURDENED DEBT



The rest of Europe, in effect, used Germany's credit rating to indulge its material desires. They borrowed as cheaply as Germans could to buy stuff they couldn't afford.

Also other than the low interest rates, the inflation in the PIIGS countries was higher than the rate of interest. It means that if the borrowing rate is 3 per cent while inflation is 4 per cent you're effectively borrowing for 1 per cent less than inflation. You're being paid to borrow.

And the European peripheral countries (PIIGS) racked up enormous amount of debt in euros. Taking the case of Greece, their debt currently amounts to around 160 per cent of their GDP. With low interest rates these countries went on a borrowing spree and since they borrowed much more than their repayment capacity is, they are in a mess. Greece is the smallest of these countries and is in the biggest mess.

Other than the citizens, the governments also started to borrow. This helped politicians keep their constituency of voters happy.

GREECE

Taking the case of Greece, a job which now pays 55,000 euros in Germany, pays 70,000 euros in Greece, even with the fact that Germany is a more productive nation. To get around pay restraints in the calendar year the Greek government simply paid employees a 13th and even 14th monthly salary -- months that didn't exist.

The Greek government categorizes certain jobs as arduous. These jobs have a retirement age of 55 for men and 50 for women. As this is also the moment when the state begins to shovel out generous pensions, more than 600 Greek professions somehow managed to get themselves classified as arduous: hairdressers, radio announcers, musicians.

It means more and more borrowing by the government, when they already have so much debt.

SPAIN
Taking the case of Spain, it had the biggest housing bubble in the world. To put things in perspective, Spain now has as many unsold homes as the United States, even though the US is six times bigger. Most of these new homes were financed with capital from abroad. Spain's real estate debt comes to around 50 per cent of its GDP.

Every time there are default threats to the Countries, the European Central Bank (ECB), helps out with a bailout. Since the start of the financial crisis ECB has bought around $80 billion of Greek and Irish and Portuguese government bonds, and lent another $450 billion or so to various European governments and European banks, accepting virtually any collateral, including Greek government bonds. Of the 126 countries with rated debt, Greece now ranked 126th: the Greeks were officially regarded as the least likely people on the planet to repay their debts.

Germany keeps contributing the ECB rescue fund. The German government gives money to the rescue fund so that it can give money to the Irish government so that the Irish government can give money to Irish banks so the Irish banks can repay their loans to the German banks. In case of Greece, a lot of German and French banks which have lent money will be in trouble if Greece defaults.

HUNGARY

In 2004, interest rates in Hungary were at 12.5 per cent. This meant borrowing money was extremely expensive.

In Austria, the banks had started to offer loans and mortgages to their customers in Swiss francs. Rates in Austria, at 2 per cent, may have been lower than in Hungary, but in Switzerland, they were even lower at around 0.5 per cent. Why would Austrians borrow at 2 per cent when they could just as easily borrow at 0.5% per cent?

The same question applied to Hungarians, except that the difference was much bigger. So the Austrian banks, many of which also had branches in Hungary began to engage in the same business there, lending to Hungarian borrowers.

Now Austrian banks have lent 140 per cent of their GDP to countries like Hungary. Even though Hungary has put in austerity measures and is trying to repay, if there was a blow up, the Austrian government wouldn't be able to save the banks and ECB might have to step in.

Similarly, Swedish banks have also lent a lot of money to Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, countries which aspire to have Euro as their currency some day.

ITALY

Using the example of Italy, Households and firms, anticipating that domestic deposits would be redenominated into the lira (Italy's currency before it started using the euro), which would then lose value against the euro, would shift their deposits to other euro-area banks. A system-wide bank run would follow. Investors anticipating that their claims on the Italian government would be redenominated into lira would shift into claims on other euro-area governments, leading to a bond market crisis . . . this would be the mother of all financial crises.

WHAT IS EXACTALY EUROPEAN DEBT DEAL?


Euro as a currency started operating on January 1, 1999. Before that the German currency -- Deutschemark -- used to be the premier currency of Europe. The Euro inherited the strength of the deutschemark. The world looked at the Euro as the new Deutschemark.

The Greek government over the years borrowed a lot of money to finance its fiscal deficit, which is the difference between what a government earns and what a government spends. A lot of this borrowing was from private investors like German banks to whom the Greek government currently owes Euro 8.6 billion.

So these private creditors of the Greek government have now agreed to take a 50 per cent haircut. It basically means is that for every 100 Euro owed to them, they have agreed to accept 50 Euro as repayment, primarily in the hope that Greece at least repays 50 per cent of what it owes to them.

So Greece is defaulting, though technically and we call it a haircut. The hope is that by doing this, Greek debt will come down to manageable proportions. Experts who have come up with this plan expect Greek debt to come down to around 120 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020, because of this plan. Otherwise it would have ballooned to around 180 per cent of its GDP.

If the German banks take a 50 per cent haircut on their outstanding debt of Euro 8.6 billion they lose around Euro 4.3 billion. A lot of money has been lent to the private sector in Greece. And if the government of a country is defaulting, how could one expect the private sector to pay up?

Greece is not the only country which owes money to Germany. Spain owes around $238 billion to Germany. Italy, Ireland and Portugal owe $190 billion, $184 billion and $47 billion, respectively.

These countries might turn around and say why we don’t get a haircut on our debt as well. And then there will be a bigger problem given that these countries are bigger and the money they owe to Germany is considerably larger.

Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor is supporting this policy due to an economic reason. Before Euro became a common currency across Europe, German exports stood at around $487 billion in 1995. In 1999, the first year of the Euro being used as a currency the exports were at Euro 469 billion. Next year they increased to Euro 548 billion. And now they stand at Euro 1 trillion. And all this was because of Euro being used as a currency.

Using Euro as a common currency took away the cost of dealing with multiple currencies and thus helped Germany expand its exports to its European neighbours big time. Also with a common currency at play, exchange rate fluctuations which play an important part in the export game, no longer mattered and what really mattered was the cost of production.

Since the beginning of the Euro in 1999, Germany has become some 30 per cent more productive than Greece. Very roughly, that means it costs 30 per cent more to produce the same amount of goods in Greece than in Germany. That is why Greece imports $64 billion and exports only $21 billion.

So the way it works is that German banks lend to other countries in Europe at low interest rates and they, in turn, buy German goods and services which are extremely competitively priced as well as of good quality.

And that is why Germany is interested in rescuing these countries or at least showing that it is trying to do something about it. Because if these countries in Europe collapse, then German exports will collapse as well.

One solution bandied around is that these countries which are in severe debt to Germany should be asked to stop using the Euro as its currency. But if they stop using the Euro as a currency, then the huge export advantage which Germany has had because of the Euro will also end. So Germany is jammed in from both sides.

A DILEMMA

The euro zone is a hybrid: a single currency with 17 national fiscal and economic policies. It has no common treasury, no tax-raising powers, no joint bonds and no central bank acting as lender of last resort. In good times, this did not matter. But in the worst financial crisis in decades, the flaws are glaring.

Countries cannot quit the euro without extreme economic pain, but nor is it easy to fix. Vetoes may be needed to maintain democratic consent, even if they make for poor crisis management. A blockage in one country endangers all. The markets are testing the ambiguities to destruction. Vague promises to “do whatever it takes” to save the euro are not enough. Will the ECB deploy its full resources to stop the crisis? How much intrusion into national policies are Greece and Italy ready to accept? How far is Germany willing to extend its credit? Will the euro zone’s states hang together or hang separately?

These are big questions, affecting the nature of the state, sovereignty and democracy. 

OLD DEBTS DOG EUROPE’s BANKS


European banks are sitting on heaps of exotic mortgage products and other risky assets that predate the financial crisis, adding to pressure on lenders that also are holding large quantities of euro-zone government debt.

Four years after instruments like "collateralized debt obligations" and "leveraged loans" became dirty words because of the massive losses they inflicted on holders, European banks still own tens of billions of euros of such assets. They also have sizable portfolios of U.S. commercial real-estate loans and subprime mortgages that could remain under pressure until the global economy recovers.

While the assets largely originated in the U.S. financial system, top American banks have moved faster than their European counterparts to rid themselves of the majority of such detritus.

Sixteen top European banks are holding a total of about €386 billion ($532 billion) of potentially suspect credit-market and real-estate assets. That's more than the €339 billion of Greek, Irish, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish government debt that those same banks were holding at the end of last year, according to European "stress test" data.

The old credit-market assets might turn out to be harmless for the banks. If real-estate markets hold steady or strengthen, for example, instruments made up of home loans could gain value and generate a steady stream of cash payments for their holders.

Still, the hefty holdings of debt from before the 2008 financial crisis compound the challenge facing the Continent's banks.

Many are holding tens of billions of euros of bonds issued by financially shaky countries. They are holding hundreds of billions more in loans to customers in those same countries, which are likely to go bad at an increasing clip if Europe's economy continues to struggle.

The situation is heightening fears that the banks lack enough capital to absorb potential losses and could require government support.

The banks generally have been holding the assets since before the financial crisis got under way four years ago, a time when real-estate assets in general had much higher prices. Some banks haven't fully written down these loans to reflect their current market values.

European banks, on average, have roughly halved their stockpiles of the legacy assets since 2007. Meanwhile, the top three U.S. banks—Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.—have slashed such assets by well over 80% over a similar period. It will be another drag on the banks' capital and returns on equity.

France's BNP Paribas SA is sitting on €12.5 billion of asset-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations tied to real-estate markets. The assets are liquid and "priced very conservatively."

French banks in particular have pointed to such sales as a key part of their plan to address a cumulative €8.8 billion capital shortfall.

The assets could lose value due to a wave of selling by the banks. If the banks sell the assets at a loss, it erodes their profits and can dent their capital bases. But if they don't sell them, they're stuck with assets that consume significant quantities of capital.

Banks in the U.K., France and Germany are the biggest holders of such assets, even after chipping away at their exposures. The four biggest British banks reduced their holdings by more than half since 2007, while four French banks trimmed theirs by less than 30%.

Barclays PLC is sitting on about £17.9 billion as of Sept. 30, down from £23.9 billion at the start of the year. The assets, which landed on the giant U.K. bank's books before mid-2007, include collateralized debt obligations, composed of securities backed by assets like mortgages, commercial real-estate loans and leveraged loans that helped finance boom-era corporate buyout deals.

At roughly €28 billion, Crédit Agricole SA has the biggest portfolio of such assets among French banks. The bank's June 30 financial report includes €8.6 billion of CDOs backed by U.S. residential mortgages. On top of that, Crédit Agricole also has at least €1 billion of U.S. mortgage-backed securities, some composed of subprime loans. With the U.S. real-estate market still hurting, further losses are possible in all these securities.

Legacy assets are also haunting Deutsche Bank AG. The bank is holding €2.9 billion in U.S. residential mortgage assets, including subprime loans. It has an additional €20.2 billion tied up in commercial mortgages and whole loans. The bank says it has hedged nearly all of its residential mortgage exposure. Deutsche's exposure to such assets amounts to more than 150% of its tangible equity—a key measure of its ability to absorb unexpected losses.

Compared with European banks, U.S. lenders have moved faster to dump such assets. Citigroup, which required $45 billion of government aid in 2008, faced intense pressure from regulators to rid itself of risky assets, many linked to mortgages that got the New York bank in trouble. Its stockpile of such assets was down by 86% to $45 billion at Sept. 30.

EXPOSURE OF U.S. Banks



-      Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the fifth- biggest U.S. bank by assets, had $2.32 billion of “funded” credit exposure to Italy’s government, financial institutions and companies as of Sept. 30.

-     Morgan Stanley’s net funded exposure tied to Italy was $1.79 billion at the end of September, accounting for most of the $2.11 billion total from the five countries. 

-      Citigroup Inc.’s “net current funded exposure” tied to the PIIGS countries was $7.2 billion at the end of September, more than three times the exposure to Belgium and France. Total cross-border claims linked to Italy were $14.5 billion.

-    JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s exposure to Italy from trading, lending and securities available for sale was $11.3 billion as of Sept. 30.

-      Bank of America Corp.’s non-U.S. exposure linked to Italy was $6.54 billion at the end of September, almost 45 percent of the total linked to the five European countries.

PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES



The Eurozone is Over

If Greece did its own thing and Germany its own, you need to have separate currencies. If Maharashtra borrowed as much as the government of India on the assumption that it is a sovereign power, the Indian rupee would collapse, too. The rupee holds only because India limits the fiscal sovereignty of its states.

One can see the eurozone being restricted to Germany, France and the Benelux countries, or the emergence of two eurozones – with northern Europe being the stronger half with a stronger euro and southern Europe – assuming it sticks together – having a weaker euro. The southern euro, or successor national currencies, have to depreciate against the northern ones, assuming the euro itself stays.

As the western world goes into recession, it is the less externally-vulnerable countries that will benefit most.

America will benefit, because it imports more than it exports and it retains sovereignty over the dollar. A global slowdown will bring down the price of its imports faster than the slowdown in its export earnings.

India will benefit for the same reason – and for the fact that it will still be growing faster than many other countries. 

The oil-producers (including Russia) will gain because oil priced in dollars will not fall too much.

The biggest losers will be the highly export-driven economies of Germany and China
These Countries will now have to find markets in new areas. Or they will have to grow their internal consumption markets through a painful process of saving less and spending more. All of them will slow down dramatically – if not slip into recession.

LESSONS FROM THIS ALL


Globalisation and absolute sovereignty are inimical to one another. 

One or the other has to dominate. If we want free trade, we cannot have political barriers to trade – and by trade here means not only the export of goods and services, but also capital and labour. Globalisation will work perfectly only if all the factors of production move freely – and markets adjust constantly to this flow.

But this is an impossibility when political power remains national. The euro experiment is failing because Europe tried to graft a political project (to achieve a peaceful continent) based on economic interdependence. It would have worked if Europe also had a sovereign government which redistributed resources from the rich to the poor. In such a scenario, Germany would subsidise Greece and the other PIIGs to improve their economic conditions and competitive abilities. Eurozone is failing because this did not happen – and Germany hogged the benefits as long as it could.

Countries running excess fiscal and current account deficits over long periods of times will get into serious trouble. 

But the reverse is also true. Countries running external surpluses for long periods of time are equally the cause of the problem. This has been the world’s blind spot so far where exporters and surplus countries were hailed as heroes and the rest castigated as zeroes and wasteful. The latter characterisation is rubbish: borrowers need lenders, and if borrowers keep on borrowing, it is because the lenders benefit from it.

Put another way, it means when countries run prolonged deficits, both parties – the surplus economies and the deficit ones – must do opposite things. The adjustment cannot be done by the deficit people alone. By wrongly categorising Germany, China and Japan as surplus heroes a lopsided world is created in which they were being eulogised for being “virtuous savers” when the “profligate” spenders were actually responsible for their growth.

The world’s problems will be solved today only if the saver economies now agree to spend lavishly (instead of lending) to right the balance. They will have to do this by sacrificing some of their old firepower and growth.

Welfarism has serious limits 

Both the US and Europe are capitalist economies that took on excessive burdens on social security – Europe more than the US – which cannot be sustained by economic activity. The US economy is sinking under the weight of its unaffordable social security (mainly medical benefits) and pensions. Europe – where the welfare state is even worse. Till recently, Europe’s inflexible economy was willing to tolerate high unemployment by doling out more by way of state benefits. This is unsustainable.

Thursday, July 9, 2015

GREEK ECONOMY: IS IT ON THE VERGE OF COLLAPSE OR HAS ALREADY DECAYED???

WHY WORLD COUNTED UPON GREECE???

Greece is the birthplace of Democracy, Western philosophy, the Olympic Games, Western Literature, Historiography, Political Science, Major Scientific and Mathematical Principles, and Western Drama, including both tragedy and comedy. The cultural and technological achievements of Greece have greatly influenced the world, having been imparted to the East through Alexander the Great's conquests, and to the West via incorporation into the Roman Empire and the succeeding Byzantine Empire. Greece's rich legacy is also reflected by its 17 UNESCO World Heritage Sites, among the most in Europe and the world.


A founding member of the United Nations, Greece was the tenth member to join the European Communities (precursor to the European Union) and has been part of the Eurozone since 2001. It is also a member of numerous other international institutions, including the Council of Europe, NATO, OECD, OSCE and the WTO. Greece, which is one of the world's largest shipping powers, has the largest economy in the Balkans, where it is an important regional investor.

Greece is the 15th largest economy in the 27-member European Union. In terms of per capita income, Greece is ranked 38th or 40th in the world at $21,910 and $25,705 for nominal GDP and PPP respectively. 



GREECE ENTRY IN EUROZONE…



In January 2001 Greece adopted the Euro as its currency, replacing the Greek drachma at an exchange rate of 340.75 drachma to the Euro. Greece is also a member of the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.

Greece was accepted into the Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union by the European Council on 19 June 2000, based on a number of criteria (inflation rate, budget deficit, public debt, long-term interest rates, exchange rate) using 1999 as the reference year. 

REVELATION OF UNDER REPORTED BUDGET DEFICIT 

After an audit commissioned by the incoming New Democracy government in 2004, Eurostat revealed that the statistics for the budget deficit had been under-reported.

Most of the differences in the revised budget deficit numbers were due to a temporary change of accounting practices by the new government, i.e., recording expenses when military material was ordered rather than received. However, it was the retroactive application of ESA95 methodology (applied since 2000) by Eurostat, that finally raised the reference year (1999) budget deficit to 3.38% of GDP, thus exceeding the 3% limit. This led to claims that Greece (similar claims have been made about other European countries like Italy) had not actually met all five accession criteria, and the common perception that Greece entered the Eurozone through "falsified" deficit numbers.


In the 2005 OECD report for Greece, it was clearly stated that "the impact of new accounting rules on the fiscal figures for the years 1997 to 1999 ranged from 0.7 to 1 percentage point of GDP; this retroactive change of methodology was responsible for the revised deficit exceeding 3% in 1999, the year of [Greece's] EMU membership qualification". The above led the Greek minister of finance to clarify that the 1999 budget deficit was below the prescribed 3% limit when calculated with the ESA79 methodology in force at the time of Greece's application, and thus the criteria had been met.
The original accounting practice for military expenses was later restored in line with Eurostat recommendations, theoretically lowering even the ESA95-calculated 1999 Greek budget deficit to below 3% (an official Eurostat calculation is still pending for 1999).

A frequent error is the confusion of the discussion regarding Greece's Eurozone entry with the controversy regarding usage of derivatives' deals with US banks by Greece and other Eurozone countries to artificially reduce their reported budget deficits. A currency swap arranged with Goldman Sachs allowed Greece to "hide" $1 billion of debt; however, this affected deficit values after 2001 (when Greece had already been admitted into the Eurozone) and is not related to Greece's Eurozone entry.

Forensic accountants found that data submitted by Greece to Eurostat had a statistical distribution indicative of manipulation.

BEGINNING OF ECONOMIC CRISIS…

By the end of 2009, as a result of a combination of international and local factors the Greek economy faced its most-severe crisis since the restoration of democracy in 1974 as the Greek government revised its deficit from an estimated 6% to 12.7% of gross domestic product (GDP).

In early 2010, through the assistance of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and numerous other banks, financial products were developed which enabled the governments of Greece, Italy and many other European countries to hide their borrowing. Dozens of similar agreements were concluded across Europe whereby banks supplied cash in advance in exchange for future payments by the governments involved; in turn, the liabilities of the involved countries were "kept off the books".

These conditions had enabled Greek as well as many other European governments to spend beyond their means, while meeting the deficit targets of the European Union.

In May 2010, the Greek government deficit was again revised and estimated to be 13.6% which was the second highest in the world relative to GDP with Iceland in first place at 15.7% and the United Kingdom third with 12.6%.

As a consequence, there was a crisis in international confidence in Greece's ability to repay its sovereign debt. To avert such a default, in May 2010 the other Eurozone countries, and the IMF, agreed to a rescue package which involved giving Greece an immediate €45 billion in loans, with more funds to follow, totalling €110 billion. To secure the funding, Greece was required to adopt harsh austerity measures to bring its deficit under control.

On 15 November 2010, the EU's statistics body Eurostat revised the public finance and debt figure for Greece and put its 2009 government deficit at 15.4% of GDP and public debt at 126.8% of GDP making it the biggest deficit (as a percentage of GDP) among the EU member nations.


In 2011, it became apparent that the bail-out would be insufficient and a second bail-out amounting to €130 billion ($173 billion) was agreed in 2012, subject to strict conditions, including financial reforms and further austerity measures. The so-called troika eventually lend the total more than 240 billion euros, or about $264 billion at today's exchange rates. The bailouts came with conditions. Lenders imposed harsh austerity terms, requiring deep budget cuts and steep tax increases. They also required Greece to overhaul its economy by streamlining the government, ending tax evasion and making Greece an easier place to do business.

Greece's accession to the euro helped to lower the country's borrowing costs. European banks lent the country billions of euros, which it used to pay for things such as the 2004 Olympic Games and higher salaries for the country's public sector workforce. The boom quickly turned to bust following the 2008 financial crisis.

As part of the deal, there was to be a 53% reduction in the Greek debt burden to private creditors and any profits made by Eurozone central banks on their holdings of Greek debt are to be repatriated back to Greece.

Greece became the epicenter of Europe's debt crisis after Wall Street imploded in 2008. With global financial markets still reeling, Greece announced in October 2009 that it had been understating its deficit figures for years, raising alarms about the soundness of Greek finances.

Greece's debt-to-GDP ratio surged from 109 per cent in 2008 to 146 per cent in 2010. Following this, the country was downgraded to junk bond status, which cut off its access to bond markets. Investors panicked and turned their attention to other indebted economies, notably Italy, Spain and France. By the spring of 2010, it was veering toward bankruptcy, which threatened to set off a new financial crisis.

Greece’s unemployment rate has climbed steadily since the 2008 Recession and now stands at approximately 25%.
OPPOSITION OF AUSTERITY MEASURES

The austerity measures were widely unpopular in Greece. In December 2014, Greek parliament called for a premature election. The central issue during the election was the austerity measures imposed by the troika.

The new government that came to power refused to accept the terms of the agreement. The political uncertainty led to a suspension of the remaining tranche of aid, unless Greece accepted the original terms of the bailout or mutually reached an agreement with its public creditors.


The money was supposed to buy Greece time to stabilize its finances and quell market fears that the euro union itself could break up. While it has helped, Greece's economic problems haven't gone away. The economy has shrunk by a quarter in five years, and unemployment is above 25 percent.

The bailout money mainly goes toward paying off Greece's international loans, rather than making its way into the economy. And the government still has a staggering debt load that it cannot begin to pay down unless a recovery takes hold.

Many economists, and many Greeks, blame the austerity measures for much of the country's continuing problems. The leftist Syriza party rode to power this year promising to renegotiate the bailout; Tsipras said that austerity had created a "humanitarian crisis" in Greece.

The current Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, is a member of the Syriza party, which has pushed for anti-austerity measures. He has rejected harsh austerity measures, referring to them as “unbearable.”
But the country's exasperated creditors, especially Germany, blame Athens for failing to conduct the economic overhauls required under its bailout agreement. They don't want to change the rules for Greece.As the debate rages, the only thing everyone agrees on is that Greece is yet again running out of money — and fast.

HEALTH OF GREEK BANKS…


Greek banks are solvent on paper, but lending is practically at a standstill and they are not able to play the role they should in financing the economy.

The European Central Bank capped its emergency credit line for Greek banks at 89 billion. Most if not all of that money has already been used to cover withdrawals by customers, and there is virtually no money available for new loans.

If a Greek bank goes bust, it could create havoc in the financial markets, because Greece has not yet put in place European rules for the orderly shutdown of failed banks.

The country’s banking sector, which has suffered severe deposit flight, is being kept alive by liquidity via the Bank of Greece.

But the European Central Bank ultimately decides whether that liquidity remains in place. ECB rules require that this emergency liquidity only be provided to banks that are solvent—that is a stretch given that the banks are closed, Greece’s bailout program has expired, and the country is in arrears with the IMF. A decision by the ECB to demand more collateral or to revoke liquidity would be devastating, leaving Greek banks unable to reopen until they are recapitalized. That could leave Greece no choice but to leave the euro.

Greece’s prime minister imposed cash withdrawal restriction to 60 euros a day and closed banks for a week. However tourists can still withdraw money if they can find an ATM that has any cash left. The Greek stock exchanges also remain closed for a week.
One of the big four banks in Greece is almost out of cash.
MOUNTING DEBT BURDEN…

The country has been in a long standoff with its European creditors on the terms of a multibillion-dollar bailout. If the country goes bankrupt or decides to leave the 19-nation eurozone, the situation could create instability in the region and reverberate around the globe.

Greece owes the European Central Bank a 3.5 billion euro payment.

The European Financial Stability Facility has lent Greece €144.6 billion ($160 billion) in recent years and the terms of those loans allow the fund to seek immediate repayment if a borrower defaults on the IMF.

Greece owes €330bn (£234bn) to its international creditors. Most of it (60pc) is owed directly to other eurozone nations, and Germany is its biggest creditor.

The rest is owed to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the ECB, and a combination of Greek and foreign banks. Under current projections, Greece will be paying back its debts until 2057.


Greece, the weak link in the eurozone, has defaulted on its debt. The International Monetary Fund did not use the term default after Greece missed its payment deadline. The fund instead placed the country in so-called arrears.

Credit-rating agencies will not consider Greece to be in default based on missing the IMF payment, for the technical reason that the IMF is not considered a commercial borrower. But the ratings agency Standard & Poor's did say that it would designate Greece as being in default if the country cannot make payments to private creditors, like 2 billion in Greek Treasury bills that are due on July 10, 2015.

Regardless of the country's technical status, missing the payment will most likely prove to be a warning that Greece will probably be unable to meet its other obligations in coming weeks to its bond holders and to the European Central Bank. That might make the central bank less willing to continue emergency loans that have been propping up the Greek banking system for the past several weeks.

If Greece defaults on its debt, it could also be locked out of the international credit market and be forced to savagely cut government expenditure. This would have an adverse impact on growth and could increase unemployment.

While a default would mean that creditors, especially European banks, would have to take a hit, care has been taken over the past few years to insulate other European countries and the European banking system from the risks of an eventual Greek default.

The impending default on the IMF loans leaves Greece sliding towards an exit from the euro, with unforeseeable consequences for Europe's common currency project. It also carries broad implications for the global financial system.

WORSENING ECONOMIC SITUATIONS…


Since Greece's debt crisis began in 2010, most international banks and foreign investors have sold their Greek bonds and other holdings, so they are no longer vulnerable to what happens in Greece. (Some private investors, who subsequently plowed back into Greek bonds, betting on a comeback, regret that decision.)

Greece closed its banks and imposed capital controls to check the growing strains on its crippled financial system, bringing the prospect of being forced out of the euro into plain sight.

After bailout talks between the left wing government and foreign lenders broke down, the European Central Bank froze vital funding support to Greece's banks, leaving Athens with little choice but to shut down the system to keep the banks from collapsing.

Banks and the stock market remained closed for a week, and there was a daily 60 euro limit on cash withdrawals from cash machines for a week too. Capital controls are likely to last for many months at least. As speculation of capital controls increased over few weeks, Greeks have pulled billions of euros from their accounts. Long queues formed in supermarkets as shoppers stocked up on essentials.

The broader consequences for Greece's economy, now back in recession, are likely to be severe, with the tourism sector, which accounts for almost a fifth of economic output, about to start its vital summer season. Anxious to reassure tourists, the government said the 60 euro cash withdrawal limit would not apply to people using foreign credit or debit cards.

Travel companies had been warning tourists for weeks that they should take extra cash, but finding empty ATMs was still a shock to many.

Lines formed at petrol stations and the dwindling number of bank machines still holding cash, highlighting the scale of the disaster facing Greeks, who have endured more than six years of economic decline.

In a country where one in four of the workforce is without a job, the plight of the pensioners, whose monthly benefits can often be the only source of income for families, is an acutely sensitive issue.

Mindful of the fact that many older Greeks do not use credit or debit cards and so do not have access to cash machines, the government has ordered 1,000 banks to open across the country to pay out a maximum of 120 euros and issue cards.

WHAT SUNDAY’S (5 JULY, 2015) GREEK REFERENDUM MEANT…

Greek voters voted to the polls in a referendum that could decide whether the country exits the euro or resumes painful negotiations with its creditors.


Greece and its international creditors — fellow eurozone countries, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank — have been negotiating for months to come up with a plan to extend the country’s bailout program and unlock frozen rescue funds. The talks never made much progress.

Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras on June 26, 2015 shocked creditors, and the broader market, by effectively breaking off talks, calling a referendum on a proposal offered by creditors.

The referendum asked voters to accept or reject the terms included in a June 25 proposal by the creditors. But Tsipras’s stunning move led European leaders to revoke that offer. So, effectively, Greek citizens voted on a proposal that was no longer on the table.

Relations between the current Greek government and the creditors have deteriorated beyond repair and that European leaders may be prepared to let the country slip out of the eurozone.

Greeks voters overwhelmingly rejected austerity proposals from the country’s creditors - the ECB, EU and IMF - in a snap referendum called by the leftist Syriza government.

THIS IS WHAT THE EXACT MATTER OF GREECE WITH IMF…


Greece has missed its deadline to repay €1.6 billion to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Greece is now the first advanced country to default on an IMF loan, and the first country to fall into arrears with the lender since Zimbabwe in 2001. 

The IMF released a statement saying: 'We have informed our executive board that Greece is now in arrears and can only receive IMF financing once the arrears are cleared.'

Greece requested a last-minute extension from the IMF which the lender said would be dealt with 'in due course'. 

The International Monetary Fund warned that Greece would need an extension of its European Union loans and a potentially a large debt writeoff if it grows more slowly than expected and economic reforms are not implemented.

IMF is overseeing the bailout, said that even if Greek policies came back on track, loans made by Europe "will need to be extended significantly" and that the country would need further concessional financing.

The IMF said Greece would need an additional 36 billion euros ($39.89 billion) in European funding from total additional financing needs of 50 billion euros due to policy slippages and the latest proposals from Athens.

Even under the most optimistic current IMF projection and with concessional financing through 2018, it said Greece's debt to gross domestic product ratio was seen at 150 percent in 2020 and 140 percent in 2022.

Using the thresholds agreed in November 2012, a haircut that yields a reduction in debt of over 30 percent of GDP would be required to meet the November 2012 debt targets.

The Fund believes that given the fragile debt dynamics of Greece, one option would be to extend the grace period to 20 years and the amortization period to 40 years on existing EU loans and to provide new official sector loans to cover financing needs falling due on similar terms at least through 2018.
Under an IMF projection where real economic growth was lower, at just 1 percent, Greece's debt would remain above 100 percent of GDP for the next three decades, even with a lengthening of maturities and new loans on concessional terms.

A lower medium-term primary surplus of 2.5 percent of GDP and lower real GDP growth of 1 percent per year would require not only concessional financing with fixed interest rates through 2020 to cover gaps as well as doubling of grace and maturities on existing debt but also a significant haircut of debt, for instance, full write-off of the stock outstanding in the GLF facility (€53.1 billion) or any other similar operation.

The immediate effect is that Greece can no longer receive financing from the IMF under the existing extended arrangement and the IMF will not approve new financing to Greece until it clears its arrears. This is standard procedure when a member fails to repay the IMF.

Greece remains a member of the Fund, with voting rights and representation on its Executive Board. The IMF’s annual health check of a member country’s economy (called surveillance) will continue to be an obligation. For the time being, Greece will also be eligible for IMF technical assistance — that is, access to IMF expertise on a range of economic issues, including tax administration and financial sector policies.

Within 12 months, the Executive Board may consider a declaration of ineligibility against Greece if Greece continues to incur arrears to the IMF. If the non-payment persists for more than 12 months, the IMF Executive Board may declare that the country is “noncooperative” in efforts to clear arrears, which could trigger a suspension of technical assistance, possibly followed by a suspension of voting rights and, ultimately—if the non-cooperation is extreme and protracted—compulsory withdrawal from the IMF.

WHAT MAY HAPPEN NEXT???


Greece may be on the verge of not just leaving the eurozone but also the European Union itself.

New elections could also be held if Greece's financial situation worsens. Or Greece could test the willingness of Russia or China to help should talks with Europe falter.

Greece may also choose to exit Eurozone nowadays termed as GREXIT as the voting on referendum turned out to be a NO by the Greeks. Exiting the euro currency union and the European Union would also involve a legal minefield that no country has yet ventured to cross. There are also no provisions for departure, voluntary or forced, from the euro currency union.

A withdrawal from the European Union will mean Greece will have to reintroduce its old currency, Drachma, likely to be greatly devalued.


A devalued currency will boost exports, spurring growth, but the flip side is that the import bill will rise.

A devalued currency will also increase Greece's debt burden, which will still be denominated in the euro.

The impending default on the IMF loans leaves Greece sliding towards an exit from the euro, with unforeseeable consequences for Europe's common currency project. It also carries broad implications for the global financial system.

TRYING TO COME OUT FROM THIS TURMOIL… 


Greece formally asked for a three-year bailout from the eurozone’s rescue fund, though Germany said it wouldn’t consider the request until it sees a full list of reforms.

Pressure is growing on both sides to come to some kind of deal and avert a potentially imminent Greek exit from the euro. Europe needs to restructure Greece’s huge debt as a key part of an emergency-financing solution, a move Germany has resisted.

Greece’s letter is a first step toward fulfilling a demand by international creditors to come up with tougher measures in return for desperately needed financing that could keep the country from bankruptcy and even worse economic turmoil.

The letter reiterates a call for debt relief, but also says Greece will put in place tax-reform and pension-related measures by the beginning of next week, though it doesn’t go into detail.

The full list of overhauls and budget cuts is what will determine whether the application for a new rescue program will be approved by the rest of the eurozone. The currency union’s leaders will assess whether it makes sense to start formal negotiations on a bailout program at an emergency summit on Sunday (12 July, 2015).

Sunday, January 1, 2012

A Very Happy New Year!!!

Every Second, Every Minute, Every Hour, Every Day, Every Week, Every Month, Every Year add New Chapter to our Life.


Some Make us Strong, 
Some Lead us to the Right Path,
Some Gives us New Challenge,
Some Gives us Memories, 
Some Gives us A NEW "ME" in us.







Wish You All A Very Happy, Prosperous, Healthy, Wealthy and Peaceful New Year 2012 Ahead!!! 

May this Year 2012 proves to be a Better CHAPTER to be added in all of ours life!!!
 



Thursday, November 17, 2011

European Debt Crisis - How it All Started???


“EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS”, THE MOST COMMONLY DISCUSSED MATTER TODAY IN FINANCIAL WORLD AS WELL IN JOB MARKETS. WHAT IS IT EXACTALY? AND HOW IT STARTED? IS IT THE RESULTANT EFFECT OF A COUPLE OF YEARS PROBLEM OR A LONG STRETCHED PROBLEM?


All these queries will be cleared in this Article. Hold your breath this Crisis is not a couple of years old, in fact it was spreading its roots tight since the Year 2000, yes MORE THAN A DECADE!!!

Meaning of Some Terms before we Start what is EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS AND HOW IT ALL STARTED

Bailout: As a person is when arrested and seeks a Bail to come out from that arrest for some time. In the same way when a Company or a Country is when provided with an emergency financial help so that they keep running and working as before is called a Bailout. In India, Kingfisher Airlines is the recent example of this.

Austerity Measures / Plans: Austerity is a policy of deficit-cutting, lower spending, and a reduction in the amount of benefits and public services provided. Austerity policies are often used by governments to reduce their deficit spending while sometimes coupled with increases in taxes to pay back creditors to reduce debt.

European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF): It is a special purpose vehicle financed by members of the eurozone to fight the European sovereign debt crisis. It was agreed by the 27 member states of the European Union on 9 May 2010, aiming at preserving financial stability in Europe by providing financial assistance to eurozone states in economic difficulty.

Contagion: The likelihood that significant economic changes in one country will spread to other countries. Contagion can refer to the spread of either economic booms or economic crises throughout a geographic region. Contagion has become a more prominent phenomenon as the global economy has grown and economies within certain geographic regions have become more correlated with one another.

HOW IT ALL STARTED?


In 1958, an organisation called European Coal and Steel Community was formed. This evolved into the European Union (EU) which was established by the Maastricht Treaty in 1993. The European Union introduced the euro on January 1, 1999. On this day, 11 member countries of the EU started using euro as their currency. It benefited countries such as Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain (together now known as the PIIGS).

Before these countries started to use the euro as a currency, they had to borrow money at interest rates much higher than the rates at which a country like Germany borrowed. When these countries started to use the euro they could borrow money at interest rates close to that of Germany, which was economically the best managed country in the EU.

OVERBURDENED DEBT



The rest of Europe, in effect, used Germany's credit rating to indulge its material desires. They borrowed as cheaply as Germans could to buy stuff they couldn't afford.

Also other than the low interest rates, the inflation in the PIIGS countries was higher than the rate of interest. It means that if the borrowing rate is 3 per cent while inflation is 4 per cent you're effectively borrowing for 1 per cent less than inflation. You're being paid to borrow.

And the European peripheral countries (PIIGS) racked up enormous amount of debt in euros. Taking the case of Greece, their debt currently amounts to around 160 per cent of their GDP. With low interest rates these countries went on a borrowing spree and since they borrowed much more than their repayment capacity is, they are in a mess. Greece is the smallest of these countries and is in the biggest mess.

Other than the citizens, the governments also started to borrow. This helped politicians keep their constituency of voters happy.

GREECE

Taking the case of Greece, a job which now pays 55,000 euros in Germany, pays 70,000 euros in Greece, even with the fact that Germany is a more productive nation. To get around pay restraints in the calendar year the Greek government simply paid employees a 13th and even 14th monthly salary -- months that didn't exist.

The Greek government categorizes certain jobs as arduous. These jobs have a retirement age of 55 for men and 50 for women. As this is also the moment when the state begins to shovel out generous pensions, more than 600 Greek professions somehow managed to get themselves classified as arduous: hairdressers, radio announcers, musicians.

It means more and more borrowing by the government, when they already have so much debt.

SPAIN
Taking the case of Spain, it had the biggest housing bubble in the world. To put things in perspective, Spain now has as many unsold homes as the United States, even though the US is six times bigger. Most of these new homes were financed with capital from abroad. Spain's real estate debt comes to around 50 per cent of its GDP.

Every time there are default threats to the Countries, the European Central Bank (ECB), helps out with a bailout. Since the start of the financial crisis ECB has bought around $80 billion of Greek and Irish and Portuguese government bonds, and lent another $450 billion or so to various European governments and European banks, accepting virtually any collateral, including Greek government bonds. Of the 126 countries with rated debt, Greece now ranked 126th: the Greeks were officially regarded as the least likely people on the planet to repay their debts.

Germany keeps contributing the ECB rescue fund. The German government gives money to the rescue fund so that it can give money to the Irish government so that the Irish government can give money to Irish banks so the Irish banks can repay their loans to the German banks. In case of Greece, a lot of German and French banks which have lent money will be in trouble if Greece defaults.

HUNGARY

In 2004, interest rates in Hungary were at 12.5 per cent. This meant borrowing money was extremely expensive.

In Austria, the banks had started to offer loans and mortgages to their customers in Swiss francs. Rates in Austria, at 2 per cent, may have been lower than in Hungary, but in Switzerland, they were even lower at around 0.5 per cent. Why would Austrians borrow at 2 per cent when they could just as easily borrow at 0.5% per cent?

The same question applied to Hungarians, except that the difference was much bigger. So the Austrian banks, many of which also had branches in Hungary began to engage in the same business there, lending to Hungarian borrowers.

Now Austrian banks have lent 140 per cent of their GDP to countries like Hungary. Even though Hungary has put in austerity measures and is trying to repay, if there was a blow up, the Austrian government wouldn't be able to save the banks and ECB might have to step in.

Similarly, Swedish banks have also lent a lot of money to Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, countries which aspire to have Euro as their currency some day.

ITALY

Using the example of Italy, Households and firms, anticipating that domestic deposits would be redenominated into the lira (Italy's currency before it started using the euro), which would then lose value against the euro, would shift their deposits to other euro-area banks. A system-wide bank run would follow. Investors anticipating that their claims on the Italian government would be redenominated into lira would shift into claims on other euro-area governments, leading to a bond market crisis . . . this would be the mother of all financial crises.

WHAT IS EXACTALY EUROPEAN DEBT DEAL?


Euro as a currency started operating on January 1, 1999. Before that the German currency -- Deutschemark -- used to be the premier currency of Europe. The Euro inherited the strength of the deutschemark. The world looked at the Euro as the new Deutschemark.

The Greek government over the years borrowed a lot of money to finance its fiscal deficit, which is the difference between what a government earns and what a government spends. A lot of this borrowing was from private investors like German banks to whom the Greek government currently owes Euro 8.6 billion.

So these private creditors of the Greek government have now agreed to take a 50 per cent haircut. It basically means is that for every 100 Euro owed to them, they have agreed to accept 50 Euro as repayment, primarily in the hope that Greece at least repays 50 per cent of what it owes to them.

So Greece is defaulting, though technically and we call it a haircut. The hope is that by doing this, Greek debt will come down to manageable proportions. Experts who have come up with this plan expect Greek debt to come down to around 120 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020, because of this plan. Otherwise it would have ballooned to around 180 per cent of its GDP.

If the German banks take a 50 per cent haircut on their outstanding debt of Euro 8.6 billion they lose around Euro 4.3 billion. A lot of money has been lent to the private sector in Greece. And if the government of a country is defaulting, how could one expect the private sector to pay up?

Greece is not the only country which owes money to Germany. Spain owes around $238 billion to Germany. Italy, Ireland and Portugal owe $190 billion, $184 billion and $47 billion, respectively.

These countries might turn around and say why we don’t get a haircut on our debt as well. And then there will be a bigger problem given that these countries are bigger and the money they owe to Germany is considerably larger.

Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor is supporting this policy due to an economic reason. Before Euro became a common currency across Europe, German exports stood at around $487 billion in 1995. In 1999, the first year of the Euro being used as a currency the exports were at Euro 469 billion. Next year they increased to Euro 548 billion. And now they stand at Euro 1 trillion. And all this was because of Euro being used as a currency.

Using Euro as a common currency took away the cost of dealing with multiple currencies and thus helped Germany expand its exports to its European neighbours big time. Also with a common currency at play, exchange rate fluctuations which play an important part in the export game, no longer mattered and what really mattered was the cost of production.

Since the beginning of the Euro in 1999, Germany has become some 30 per cent more productive than Greece. Very roughly, that means it costs 30 per cent more to produce the same amount of goods in Greece than in Germany. That is why Greece imports $64 billion and exports only $21 billion.

So the way it works is that German banks lend to other countries in Europe at low interest rates and they, in turn, buy German goods and services which are extremely competitively priced as well as of good quality.

And that is why Germany is interested in rescuing these countries or at least showing that it is trying to do something about it. Because if these countries in Europe collapse, then German exports will collapse as well.

One solution bandied around is that these countries which are in severe debt to Germany should be asked to stop using the Euro as its currency. But if they stop using the Euro as a currency, then the huge export advantage which Germany has had because of the Euro will also end. So Germany is jammed in from both sides.

A DILEMMA

The euro zone is a hybrid: a single currency with 17 national fiscal and economic policies. It has no common treasury, no tax-raising powers, no joint bonds and no central bank acting as lender of last resort. In good times, this did not matter. But in the worst financial crisis in decades, the flaws are glaring.

Countries cannot quit the euro without extreme economic pain, but nor is it easy to fix. Vetoes may be needed to maintain democratic consent, even if they make for poor crisis management. A blockage in one country endangers all. The markets are testing the ambiguities to destruction. Vague promises to “do whatever it takes” to save the euro are not enough. Will the ECB deploy its full resources to stop the crisis? How much intrusion into national policies are Greece and Italy ready to accept? How far is Germany willing to extend its credit? Will the euro zone’s states hang together or hang separately?

These are big questions, affecting the nature of the state, sovereignty and democracy. 

OLD DEBTS DOG EUROPE’s BANKS


European banks are sitting on heaps of exotic mortgage products and other risky assets that predate the financial crisis, adding to pressure on lenders that also are holding large quantities of euro-zone government debt.

Four years after instruments like "collateralized debt obligations" and "leveraged loans" became dirty words because of the massive losses they inflicted on holders, European banks still own tens of billions of euros of such assets. They also have sizable portfolios of U.S. commercial real-estate loans and subprime mortgages that could remain under pressure until the global economy recovers.

While the assets largely originated in the U.S. financial system, top American banks have moved faster than their European counterparts to rid themselves of the majority of such detritus.

Sixteen top European banks are holding a total of about €386 billion ($532 billion) of potentially suspect credit-market and real-estate assets. That's more than the €339 billion of Greek, Irish, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish government debt that those same banks were holding at the end of last year, according to European "stress test" data.

The old credit-market assets might turn out to be harmless for the banks. If real-estate markets hold steady or strengthen, for example, instruments made up of home loans could gain value and generate a steady stream of cash payments for their holders.

Still, the hefty holdings of debt from before the 2008 financial crisis compound the challenge facing the Continent's banks.

Many are holding tens of billions of euros of bonds issued by financially shaky countries. They are holding hundreds of billions more in loans to customers in those same countries, which are likely to go bad at an increasing clip if Europe's economy continues to struggle.

The situation is heightening fears that the banks lack enough capital to absorb potential losses and could require government support.

The banks generally have been holding the assets since before the financial crisis got under way four years ago, a time when real-estate assets in general had much higher prices. Some banks haven't fully written down these loans to reflect their current market values.

European banks, on average, have roughly halved their stockpiles of the legacy assets since 2007. Meanwhile, the top three U.S. banks—Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.—have slashed such assets by well over 80% over a similar period. It will be another drag on the banks' capital and returns on equity.

France's BNP Paribas SA is sitting on €12.5 billion of asset-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations tied to real-estate markets. The assets are liquid and "priced very conservatively."

French banks in particular have pointed to such sales as a key part of their plan to address a cumulative €8.8 billion capital shortfall.

The assets could lose value due to a wave of selling by the banks. If the banks sell the assets at a loss, it erodes their profits and can dent their capital bases. But if they don't sell them, they're stuck with assets that consume significant quantities of capital.

Banks in the U.K., France and Germany are the biggest holders of such assets, even after chipping away at their exposures. The four biggest British banks reduced their holdings by more than half since 2007, while four French banks trimmed theirs by less than 30%.

Barclays PLC is sitting on about £17.9 billion as of Sept. 30, down from £23.9 billion at the start of the year. The assets, which landed on the giant U.K. bank's books before mid-2007, include collateralized debt obligations, composed of securities backed by assets like mortgages, commercial real-estate loans and leveraged loans that helped finance boom-era corporate buyout deals.

At roughly €28 billion, Crédit Agricole SA has the biggest portfolio of such assets among French banks. The bank's June 30 financial report includes €8.6 billion of CDOs backed by U.S. residential mortgages. On top of that, Crédit Agricole also has at least €1 billion of U.S. mortgage-backed securities, some composed of subprime loans. With the U.S. real-estate market still hurting, further losses are possible in all these securities.

Legacy assets are also haunting Deutsche Bank AG. The bank is holding €2.9 billion in U.S. residential mortgage assets, including subprime loans. It has an additional €20.2 billion tied up in commercial mortgages and whole loans. The bank says it has hedged nearly all of its residential mortgage exposure. Deutsche's exposure to such assets amounts to more than 150% of its tangible equity—a key measure of its ability to absorb unexpected losses.

Compared with European banks, U.S. lenders have moved faster to dump such assets. Citigroup, which required $45 billion of government aid in 2008, faced intense pressure from regulators to rid itself of risky assets, many linked to mortgages that got the New York bank in trouble. Its stockpile of such assets was down by 86% to $45 billion at Sept. 30.

EXPOSURE OF U.S. Banks



-      Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the fifth- biggest U.S. bank by assets, had $2.32 billion of “funded” credit exposure to Italy’s government, financial institutions and companies as of Sept. 30.

-     Morgan Stanley’s net funded exposure tied to Italy was $1.79 billion at the end of September, accounting for most of the $2.11 billion total from the five countries. 

-      Citigroup Inc.’s “net current funded exposure” tied to the PIIGS countries was $7.2 billion at the end of September, more than three times the exposure to Belgium and France. Total cross-border claims linked to Italy were $14.5 billion.

-    JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s exposure to Italy from trading, lending and securities available for sale was $11.3 billion as of Sept. 30.

-      Bank of America Corp.’s non-U.S. exposure linked to Italy was $6.54 billion at the end of September, almost 45 percent of the total linked to the five European countries.

PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES



The Eurozone is Over

If Greece did its own thing and Germany its own, you need to have separate currencies. If Maharashtra borrowed as much as the government of India on the assumption that it is a sovereign power, the Indian rupee would collapse, too. The rupee holds only because India limits the fiscal sovereignty of its states.

One can see the eurozone being restricted to Germany, France and the Benelux countries, or the emergence of two eurozones – with northern Europe being the stronger half with a stronger euro and southern Europe – assuming it sticks together – having a weaker euro. The southern euro, or successor national currencies, have to depreciate against the northern ones, assuming the euro itself stays.

As the western world goes into recession, it is the less externally-vulnerable countries that will benefit most.

America will benefit, because it imports more than it exports and it retains sovereignty over the dollar. A global slowdown will bring down the price of its imports faster than the slowdown in its export earnings.

India will benefit for the same reason – and for the fact that it will still be growing faster than many other countries. 

The oil-producers (including Russia) will gain because oil priced in dollars will not fall too much.

The biggest losers will be the highly export-driven economies of Germany and China
These Countries will now have to find markets in new areas. Or they will have to grow their internal consumption markets through a painful process of saving less and spending more. All of them will slow down dramatically – if not slip into recession.

LESSONS FROM THIS ALL


Globalisation and absolute sovereignty are inimical to one another. 

One or the other has to dominate. If we want free trade, we cannot have political barriers to trade – and by trade here means not only the export of goods and services, but also capital and labour. Globalisation will work perfectly only if all the factors of production move freely – and markets adjust constantly to this flow.

But this is an impossibility when political power remains national. The euro experiment is failing because Europe tried to graft a political project (to achieve a peaceful continent) based on economic interdependence. It would have worked if Europe also had a sovereign government which redistributed resources from the rich to the poor. In such a scenario, Germany would subsidise Greece and the other PIIGs to improve their economic conditions and competitive abilities. Eurozone is failing because this did not happen – and Germany hogged the benefits as long as it could.

Countries running excess fiscal and current account deficits over long periods of times will get into serious trouble. 

But the reverse is also true. Countries running external surpluses for long periods of time are equally the cause of the problem. This has been the world’s blind spot so far where exporters and surplus countries were hailed as heroes and the rest castigated as zeroes and wasteful. The latter characterisation is rubbish: borrowers need lenders, and if borrowers keep on borrowing, it is because the lenders benefit from it.

Put another way, it means when countries run prolonged deficits, both parties – the surplus economies and the deficit ones – must do opposite things. The adjustment cannot be done by the deficit people alone. By wrongly categorising Germany, China and Japan as surplus heroes a lopsided world is created in which they were being eulogised for being “virtuous savers” when the “profligate” spenders were actually responsible for their growth.

The world’s problems will be solved today only if the saver economies now agree to spend lavishly (instead of lending) to right the balance. They will have to do this by sacrificing some of their old firepower and growth.

Welfarism has serious limits 

Both the US and Europe are capitalist economies that took on excessive burdens on social security – Europe more than the US – which cannot be sustained by economic activity. The US economy is sinking under the weight of its unaffordable social security (mainly medical benefits) and pensions. Europe – where the welfare state is even worse. Till recently, Europe’s inflexible economy was willing to tolerate high unemployment by doling out more by way of state benefits. This is unsustainable.